Solving challenges collaboratively when faced by an emergency situation not only reveals critical thinking abilities when faced with an e-learning simulation but also in real life situations. How people respond to challenges involving an emergency depends on how many people are on the scene of the emergency. When there are trained responders on the scene, bystanders rely on them to take charge of the situation. However, if none of the people are official emergency responders then the group waits for someone to take charge and lead.
One of the classic cases where people did not respond to an emergency happened in the 1960's in New York City where thirty eight people stood by and didn't respond while a man stabbed Kitty Genovese to death. All thirty eight people thought that someone else would call the police. As a result no one did.
In the last post, students on Path B and Path C receive an emergency notification on their wearable technology unit that the student on Path A was in trouble. Students use the GPS signal from the student on Path A to go to his or her aid. They arrive on the scene to find the following situation:
The students are faced with a problem that they must come up with a solution for. Collaboratively, what steps must they take in order to come up with a solution. Think in terms of Bloom's Revised Taxonomy. One of the students needs to take charge. Adding to the pressure are three important facts:
What happens if no one takes charge?
One of the classic cases where people did not respond to an emergency happened in the 1960's in New York City where thirty eight people stood by and didn't respond while a man stabbed Kitty Genovese to death. All thirty eight people thought that someone else would call the police. As a result no one did.
In the last post, students on Path B and Path C receive an emergency notification on their wearable technology unit that the student on Path A was in trouble. Students use the GPS signal from the student on Path A to go to his or her aid. They arrive on the scene to find the following situation:
- An unidentified snake is seen a few feet from the Path A student.
- The student from Path A has received a bite on the right ankle. He or she is conscious but lying flat on the ground, Breathing is shallow.
- The assessment event requires that all of them get to the end together. They can't just leave him or her and go on.
- The clock in the corner of their screens shows that the first assessment scenario is ticking down. They still need to solve the clues that will lead them to the emerald key.
- There are bushes with berries on them and trees. The solution to this emergency might be close by.
Lets assume for a moment, that they exercise superb reasoning skills and demonstrate the highest levels of Bloom's Taxonomy and they are able to solve the emergency problem. What challenges lie ahead? Well they have to get to what looks like a huge statue that they can see in the distance which is directly north of their position. In their way are two problems:
- Just a few few feet away seems to be a narrow crevasse that is approximately 3 metres across. They need to find a way to get across it. Again, think about what they have available in the immediate environment and what they have in their backpacks. After that they have a short walk to the river which at this point has slowed down dramatically. The water is waist deep so they can probably wade across and come ashore in front of the statue.
- The second choice is to back track to the west to where they saw the remains of a bridge and solve the problem by completing the span. The needed addition to the bridge would need be about 2 metres. Then they could follow the river north east towards the statue. Time becomes an important factor.
To complicate the decision, the student from Path C remarked that when he or she was following the river, he or she noticed a glowing green object on the other side of the river halfway between the bridge and the statue. He thought he could make out the following symbol on it but they would need to retrieve it to be sure. If they misinterpret any symbol at the end, then the can't solve the location of the emerald key and going back would result in them running out of time.
Some important questions to ask yourselves are:
- What disciplines are coming into play in this collaborative problem solving? Are skill sets dealing with mathematics, physics, geography, medicine, geology, linguistics, botany needed in the analysis and solution of the challenging tasks faced by the students? Is their ability to use the web for research an important factor in effectively solving the tasks?
- What can we learn from assessing collaboration in such challenging tasks?
I know that these situations seem contrived( gifted understatement!) but the point is to place problem solving, critical thinking and the ability to do innovative thinking under the microscope.
Next.. the final leg of this scenario, the final clue revealing the location and the introduction to an incredible follow up real world issue that will also challenge you as well as the students dealing with the pressing problem of tracking terrorists and potentially innovative solutions to this problem.
No comments:
Post a Comment